The Velvet Revolution and Masaryk’s dream for ‘50 years of peace’

Some say it was too ‘velvet’ and not ‘revolutionary’ enough; but to keep Masaryk’s dream of peace, Czech political culture must change

Politics & Policy|Society
Petr Nováček | 17.11.2011
The sweet smell of freedom and democracy has soured over the past 22 years

November 17 is a red letter day in Czech calendars now, marking Struggle for Freedom and Democracy Day, known to the world as the anniversary of what has come to be known as the Velvet Revolution. On that autumn day in back 1989, a student procession began in Albertov marking the 50th anniversary of another event during a totalitarian age.

Back in 1939, Nazi occupiers had executed 10 student leaders, sent 1,100 to concentration camps and were ready to close Czech universities for three years in retaliation for an anti-occupation demonstration held a couple of weeks earlier, which manifested in the Jan.15 funeral of student Jan Opletal, who had been shot dead along with a worker, Václav Sedláček, on Oct. 28.

During the war, the Czechoslovak government in exile in London had proclaimed Nov.17 to be International Students’ Day; in 1989, the Communist leader Milouš Jakeš allowed a procession of students to mark the event, as an anti-fascist event marking the martyrdom of Opletal and other students during the Nazi occupation.

Velvet Revolution

It is, of course, symbolic that in October and November of 1939 and fifty years later, the demonstrations were in fact both calling for the return of freedom and democracy. The ranks of the peaceful student march that began at Albertov, swelled with every step; it is seen as the start of the Velvet Revolution, the non-violent movement that culminated less than six weeks later in the fall of the Communist government in Czechoslovakia and election of Václav Havel as president.

Easing their path, of course, was the fact that Jakeš and his comrades were horrified by the awakening of peoples in neighboring Poland and Hungary, and in particular the fall of the Berlin Wall. The winds of change notwithstanding, Jakeš let the baton-wielding riot police take out the regime’s frustrations on the students and others who protesting on Národní třída, Prague’s main avenue at the base of Wenceslas Square.

Non-violent protesters present flowers to riot policeman

That was on a Friday. However, before the top party comrades had returned for a weekend at the famous chateau in Orlík the democratic Civic Forum (OF) had been formed, and thousands were filling squares demanding freedom and democracy. By then, the regime had gone numb, and no longer dared to intervene with obvious force.

Jakeš resigned as General Secretary of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia; Gustáv Husák stepped down as president on Dec. 10, the same day that Marián Čalfa was appointed prime minister (replacing the discredited Ladislav Adamec) and became acting president, until “prisoner of conscience” Havel took over on Dec. 29.

A plethora of illusions

Some have theorized that there was too much ‘velvet’ and not enough ‘revolution.’ Some have theorized that there was too much “velvet” and not enough “revolution” — had the OF organized free elections in February 1990, the Communists would have been soundly defeated, and Marián Čalfa along with them, and the party could have been banned (today, the largely unreformed KSČM remains in the lower house of Parliament, and polls show it will be after the next elections, as well).

At the time, the country had experiences 41 years of Communism and before that, six years of Nazi occupation. Few people had any first-hand experience of participating in a functional democracy; practically no one of the leaders of the OF and Citizens Against Violence movements did, apart from Prof. Zdeněk Jičínský, who had a hand in Alexander Dubček’s reforms aimed at achieving “Socialism with a human face,” or the Prague Spring, crushed by the arrival of Warsaw Pact troops.

Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk in 1925

The population at large was equally unfamiliar with the democratic process. Citizens chanted “Havel to the Castle” — but also cheered for Dubček. Only to an enlightened few was it was clear that there would be no interim, freer “human” form of Socialism before the transition to a capitalist system. People were full of illusions, with taboos lifted day after day, yet they could not have imagined how their democracy would look in just ten short years.

Masaryk’s wish

The euphoria eventually faded. The Slovaks decided to go their own way, and Czechoslovakia split into two states on January 1, 1993. The center-right Civic Democrats (ODS) swept into parliament on the back of a perfect campaign, full of promises that the coupon or voucher privatization program of its co-founder, then Finance Minister Václav Klaus (the current president), would give everyone their rightful piece of the state pie. Moreover, the sun had set on the Civic Movement (OH), an offshoot of the OF close to Havel; the political pendulum had swung to the right, and the will to compromise faded.

The amount of corruption, theft, asset-stripping and ruin of state companies considered to be the ‘family silver’ suggest a firmer, more visible market hand was required. The large-scale privatization, of which Klaus, then prime minister, was chief architect, took place at a dizzying speed; lawyers had difficulty keeping up, and some of the laws were flawed, ripe for exploitation. For the champion of the free market, none of that much mattered. The invisible hand would correct any deficiencies, and individual liberties and minimum regulatory intervention was for the liberal Klaus the ideal.

The amount of corruption, theft, asset-stripping (or “tunneling,” a term the Czech gave to the world) and the ruin of state companies, including those considered to be the “family silver,” suggest a firmer, more visible hand was required.

Show comments
Comments:1

Comments

Czech Position values democratic discussion. Please respect the Terms of Service, which are intended to encourage correct and meaningful communications.

By entering your comment, you agree to these rules. We reserve the right to remove improper comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Loss of optimism

When I first visited the Czech Republic in 1995, the Czech people were very energized and optimistic about change. Now, 16 years later, I see Czechs have become quite cynical because of the corruption in the political system. The failure of elected leaders like President Klaus to take action to clean up the corruption is very disappointing.

Hide comments

Popular content